Skip to content

Report 1 · Birds · East Africa

Can AI name an East African bird from its song?

Three AI models that identify birds from sound, tested on recordings the iNaturalist community has already named. BirdNET v3 matched the community most often, in 75% of 589 recordings; Perch v2 matched 67% and BirdNET v2.4 65%.

Version 15 Oct 2026

How we tested BirdNET and Perch

iNaturalist is a site where people post wildlife sightings and sound recordings, and other members help name the species. We took 589 bird recordings from East Africa, most of them from Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania, where the community has agreed on the bird, and played each one to three AI models that name birds from sound: BirdNET v3, Perch v2 and BirdNET v2.4. Then we counted how often a model’s first answer was the bird the community named.

We treat the community’s answer as the reference, and it is not always right. A recording can catch a second bird calling in the background, and a community can agree on the wrong name. Nobody listened to every recording again, so we say a model matched the community, not that it was right.

Executive summary

  • BirdNET v3 matched the community most often: its first answer was the community’s bird in 3 of every 4 recordings (75%). Perch v2 (67%) and BirdNET v2.4 (65%) came next, too close to each other to separate.
  • Birds with more recorded sound are matched more often: BirdNET v3 matched 18% of recordings of birds with under 10 sound recordings on eBird (only 11 recordings here), and 91% for birds with 300 or more.
  • When all three models name the same bird, it is the community’s bird 91% of the time. When all three differ, BirdNET v3’s answer matches only 30% of the time.
  • When two models agree and the third differs, the pair usually does better: it matched 32 to 5 against Perch v2 and 53 to 6 against BirdNET v2.4. The exception is BirdNET v3, which alone did as well as the pair against it (10 to 9).
  • A strong score is a good sign: when a model scored its first answer 0.7 or higher, it matched 88 to 95% of the time.
  • Nearly one in five recordings (19%) fooled every model, while at least one model matched in 480 of the 589 recordings.
  • A photo makes no difference: for the same birds, recordings with and without an observer’s photo were matched within 3 points of each other.
  • Most East African birds have little recorded sound: 1,179 of the 1,556 birds in eBird’s archive have fewer than 30 sound recordings from the region.
  • No model named the Udzungwa Forest Partridge in any of its 13 recordings; eBird holds only 16 sound recordings of it.

Findings

What else the same recordings show, beyond which model came first.

Nearly one in five fooled every model

Each square is one of the 589 recordings
At least one model named the community’s bird in 480 of the 589 recordings. Point at a square to see the bird, and click it to listen.

No model knew the Udzungwa Forest Partridge

The seven most-recorded birds
All three models matchedOne or two matchedNo model matched
  • Hadada Ibis
    20 of 23 by all three
  • Montane Nightjar
    21 of 23 by all three
  • Common Bulbul
    15 of 21 by all three
  • White-browed Robin-Chat
    17 of 20 by all three
  • Red-chested Cuckoo
    15 of 15 by all three
  • Ring-necked Dove
    10 of 13 by all three
  • Udzungwa Forest Partridge
    0 of 13 by all three
It lives only in the Udzungwa Mountains of Tanzania. None of the three models named it in any of its 13 recordings. eBird’s archive holds only 16 sound recordings of it, made by two people, the first in 2024, so there was very little for a model to learn from. Choose a bird to see its recordings.
Photo creditsPhoto: Diego Delso, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Photo: Allan Drewitt, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Photo: Ulas koksal1, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Photo: flowcomm, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Photo: Giles Laurent, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Photo: JonRichfield, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons · Photo: Heinrich Human, CC0 1.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The less sound exists for a bird, the more the models miss it

Share matched, by sound recordings of the bird on eBird
BirdNET v3Perch v2BirdNET v2.4
eBird’s Macaulay Library is one of the largest collections of bird sound, so it is a fair measure of how much sound exists for a bird. Where it holds under 10 East African recordings of a bird, BirdNET v3 matched 18% of the time, though that is only 11 recordings. Where it holds 300 or more, 91%. This counts East Africa only, and the models learned from the whole world.

Just over three in four East African birds have little recorded sound

The 1,556 birds in eBird’s archive, by sound recordings
eBird’s archive held 39,731 sound recordings of birds from the region on 27 September 2026. 1,179 of the 1,556 birds have fewer than 30, and 279 have photographs and no sound at all.

When all three agree, trust the answer

Share matched, by how many models agreed
When two agree we score the answer they share, and when all three differ we score BirdNET v3’s. All three agreed on 3 of every 5 recordings.

A photo makes no difference

The same birds, with and without a photo
With a photo (92)Sound only (167)
The models hear only the sound, but the people naming the bird on iNaturalist can also use the observer’s photo. So we compared the 53 birds recorded both with and without a photo: the models matched them about equally often, within 3 points.
The numbers behind the charts
All recordings
First answer matched
BirdNET v3: 75.0%(442)Perch v2: 66.9%(394)BirdNET v2.4: 65.2%(384)
Matched within three guesses
BirdNET v3: 84.2%(496)Perch v2: 76.9%(453)BirdNET v2.4: 72.7%(428)
Recordings a model gave no answer for
Gave no answer · counted as a miss above
BirdNET v3: 3(0.5%)Perch v2: 6(1.0%)BirdNET v2.4: 13(2.2%)
First answer matched · of the recordings it answered
BirdNET v3: 75.4%of 586Perch v2: 67.6%of 583BirdNET v2.4: 66.7%of 576
By how often the bird is in our collection
Once · 120 recordings (120 birds)
BirdNET v3: 55.8%Perch v2: 44.2%BirdNET v2.4: 42.5%
2 to 4 times · 221 recordings (87 birds)
BirdNET v3: 72.9%Perch v2: 64.7%BirdNET v2.4: 61.1%
5 times or more · 248 recordings (26 birds)
BirdNET v3: 86.3%Perch v2: 79.8%BirdNET v2.4: 79.8%
By how much sound eBird holds for the bird
Under 10 on eBird · 11 recordings (9 birds)
BirdNET v3: 18.2%Perch v2: 18.2%BirdNET v2.4: 27.3%
10 to 29 on eBird · 83 recordings (52 birds)
BirdNET v3: 51.8%Perch v2: 34.9%BirdNET v2.4: 30.1%
30 to 99 on eBird · 207 recordings (108 birds)
BirdNET v3: 72.5%Perch v2: 63.3%BirdNET v2.4: 64.3%
100 to 299 on eBird · 223 recordings (55 birds)
BirdNET v3: 84.3%Perch v2: 78.9%BirdNET v2.4: 76.7%
300 or more on eBird · 64 recordings (8 birds)
BirdNET v3: 90.6%Perch v2: 85.9%BirdNET v2.4: 79.7%
By the model’s own score
Weak score · below 0.50
BirdNET v3: 43.4%of 173Perch v2: 54.4%of 377BirdNET v2.4: 36.6%of 216
Moderate score · 0.50–0.69
BirdNET v3: 78.2%of 78Perch v2: 85.9%of 71BirdNET v2.4: 68.4%of 57
Strong score · 0.70 and above
BirdNET v3: 91.3%of 335Perch v2: 94.8%of 135BirdNET v2.4: 87.8%of 303
With and without an observer’s photo
Same birds, with a photo · 92 recordings
BirdNET v3: 83.7%Perch v2: 76.1%BirdNET v2.4: 73.9%
Same birds, sound only · 167 recordings
BirdNET v3: 83.2%Perch v2: 79.0%BirdNET v2.4: 73.1%
All recordings with a photo · 219 recordings
BirdNET v3: 71.7%Perch v2: 61.2%BirdNET v2.4: 59.8%
All sound-only recordings · 370 recordings
BirdNET v3: 77.0%Perch v2: 70.3%BirdNET v2.4: 68.4%

Agreement between models: all 3 agree on 356 recordings, matched 90.7%; 2 agree on 153 recordings, matched 61.4%; all differ on 80 recordings, matched 30.0%.

No answer: at least one model gave no answer on 21 of the 589 recordings, two or more on 1, and never all three. No answer means no detection was stored for the recording, so we cannot tell a model that heard no bird from a run that did not finish.

Head to head: BirdNET v3 matched 66 recordings that Perch v2 missed, against 18 the other way; Perch v2 and BirdNET v2.4 split 62 to 52.

How we counted

We searched iNaturalist for bird recordings from South Sudan, Djibouti, Eritrea, Somalia, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi, Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia, and gathered 1,281. This report uses the 589 that iNaturalist marks Research Grade, meaning the community has agreed on the species. The rest are still waiting for that agreement and are left out.

Where the 589 come from: Kenya 263, Uganda 121, Tanzania 116, Rwanda 36, Ethiopia 17, Somalia 3, South Sudan 1, Burundi 1. 31 have no country on the record.

A model’s first answer is the bird it is most sure of anywhere in the recording. It counts as a match when that is the species the community named. A model that gave no answer counts as a miss, and a recording named down to a subspecies is matched by its species.

The sound and photograph counts come from eBird’s Macaulay Library, which we copy every week for the same countries. They are as of 27 September 2026, cover East Africa only, and count a bird’s named sub-groups with the bird. Recordings in that archive that are not of a bird species, such as chimpanzees and frogs, are left out.

A model may have heard some of these recordings before. Perch v2 was trained partly on Research Grade sound from iNaturalist, downloaded in March 2025, and 422 of the 589 recordings were made before then. We did not check which ones it was trained on, or what BirdNET was trained on, so a match here can be a recording the model already knew.

The recordings are the ones that fit our rules, not a random sample, and a few keen recordists supplied many of them. So these results describe this collection. They cannot crown a winner for every place and every bird.

Explore the recordings

Every recording in the report. Each card shows the community’s bird, what each model guessed, and a picture: the observer’s own photo when they shared one, otherwise a reference picture of the species. Open one to listen.

How to read a card

The lights, the bar and the score colours

The lights: who names which bird

The square is the bird iNaturalist names. Each dot is one model, always in this order: BirdNET v3, Perch v2, BirdNET v2.4. Here the first two name iNaturalist’s bird and the third names a bird of its own.

  • Same birdThe model names the bird iNaturalist names.
  • Another bird, sharedTwo or three models name the same bird, but not iNaturalist’s. The bracket joins them.
  • On its ownThe model names a bird no other model names.
  • No answerThe model kept no answer for this recording.

The bar across the top of a card

  • All agree iNaturalist and all three models name the same bird
  • 1 or 2 of 3 agree One or two models name the same bird as iNaturalist
  • Disagree No model names the same bird as iNaturalist

How sure each model is

  • Strongscore 0.70 and above
  • Moderatescore 0.50–0.69
  • Weakscore below 0.50

Narrow the list. A recording is shown only if it fits every answer you choose. The number on each answer is how many recordings you would see if you chose it, so the numbers change as you answer.

Do the models agree with iNaturalist?

How many models named the bird iNaturalist names.

Do the models agree with each other?

How many models named the same bird, whether or not it is iNaturalist’s.

How much sound exists for this bird?

Sound recordings of the bird from East Africa in eBird’s archive.

Is there a photo?

Whether the observer added their own photo of the bird.

1–12 of 589 observations

African Goshawk

Photo: Chris Eason from London, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

All agree

iNaturalist says

African Goshawk

Aerospiza tachiro

🇹🇿 Tanzania · 2015-04-17

78 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

African Goshawk0.920.590.71

iNaturalist and all 3 models name the same bird.

Sentinel Lark

(c) congonaturalist, some rights reserved (CC BY-NC)

DisagreeObserver’s photo

iNaturalist says

Sentinel Lark

Corypha athi

🇰🇪 Kenya · 2015-11-07

87 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

Spotted Sandpiper0.390.04
Cape Robin-Chat0.08

No model names iNaturalist’s bird; two of them name the same other bird.

Verreaux's Eagle-Owl

Photo: Jan Hansen, CC BY 4.0, via Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library

2 of 3 agree

iNaturalist says

Verreaux's Eagle-Owl

Ketupa lactea

🇹🇿 Tanzania · 2015-06-08

52 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

Verreaux's Eagle-Owl0.920.26
Northern Grey-headed Sparrow0.01

2 of 3 models name the same bird as iNaturalist.

African Fish Eagle

Photo: Steve Kelling, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library

2 of 3 agree

iNaturalist says

African Fish Eagle

Icthyophaga vocifer

Ruaha National park · 2015-08-26

67 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

African Fish Eagle0.990.62

2 of 3 models name the same bird as iNaturalist.

House Sparrow

(c) tadrisa, some rights reserved (CC BY-NC)

All agreeObserver’s photo

iNaturalist says

House Sparrow

Passer domesticus

🇹🇿 Tanzania · 2016-03-24

37 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

House Sparrow0.830.670.93

iNaturalist and all 3 models name the same bird.

White-browed Robin-Chat

Photo: flowcomm, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

2 of 3 agree

iNaturalist says

White-browed Robin-Chat

Cossypha heuglini

🇷🇼 Rwanda · 2016-08-10

636 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

White-browed Robin-Chat0.360.17
Rose-ringed Parakeet0.04

2 of 3 models name the same bird as iNaturalist.

Hamerkop

(c) Livia Labate, some rights reserved (CC BY-NC)

All agreeObserver’s photo

iNaturalist says

Hamerkop

Scopus umbretta

🇷🇼 Rwanda · 2016-10-05

89 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

Hamerkop0.770.360.98

iNaturalist and all 3 models name the same bird.

African Wood Owl

Photo: Jan Hansen, CC BY 4.0, via Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library

All agree

iNaturalist says

African Wood Owl

Strix woodfordii

🇹🇿 Tanzania · 2016-10-18

136 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

African Wood Owl0.930.340.99

iNaturalist and all 3 models name the same bird.

White-bellied Go-away-bird

(c) Ryan Donnelly, some rights reserved (CC BY)

2 of 3 agreeObserver’s photo

iNaturalist says

White-bellied Go-away-bird

Crinifer leucogaster

🇰🇪 Kenya · 2017-07-08

104 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

White-bellied Go-away-bird0.890.20
European Roller0.17

2 of 3 models name the same bird as iNaturalist.

White-bellied Tit

Photo: Gary Leavens, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library

Disagree

iNaturalist says

White-bellied Tit

Melaniparus albiventris

🇹🇿 Tanzania · 2017-03-14

42 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

Fork-tailed Drongo0.030.09

No model names iNaturalist’s bird; two of them name the same other bird.

Red-chested Cuckoo

Photo: Giles Laurent, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

All agree

iNaturalist says

Red-chested Cuckoo

Cuculus solitarius

Kibale NP · 2018-02-26

221 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

Red-chested Cuckoo0.860.870.99

iNaturalist and all 3 models name the same bird.

Black-and-white-casqued Hornbill

(c) Yvonne A. de Jong, some rights reserved (CC BY-NC)

All agreeObserver’s photo

iNaturalist says

Black-and-white-casqued Hornbill

Bycanistes subcylindricus

🇺🇬 Uganda · 2019-03-12

134 sound recordings on eBird

The models say

Black-and-white-casqued Hornbill0.500.470.81

iNaturalist and all 3 models name the same bird.

1–12 of 589 observations
Page 1 / 50

iNaturalist metadata checked 2026-10-02 13:27 UTC. Research Grade is community-reviewed evidence, not independently checked ground truth. Model results are stored outputs; no model was rerun for this page. Provider API.